To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Immediately after pre-operating had taken place, the attention way investigation was searched to possess outliers (data activities bigger than 1.5 times the new interquartile diversity for certain changeable), because of the investigating boxplots. The new rural research affairs (n = 19) was indeed excluded having individual study affairs within the eyes-tracking tips , including cuatro.22% of your own full analysis.
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig dos) (overlooking condition nervousness) and r (15) = -.499, p = .041 (dealing with having state nervousness).
Discover no tall dating ranging from LSAS score and you may very first fixation duration on looks, r (23) = -.141, p = .521 that was and the circumstances when handling to own state stress playing with a limited relationship r (20) = -.133, p =. 556
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations and additionally showed that whenever managing to possess condition nervousness, there clearly was no significant relationships involving the LSAS scores and you can dwell time for you your head roentgen (25) = -.063, p = .756, one’s body roentgen (27) = -.090, p = .643, together with history roentgen (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships datingranking.net/sugar-daddies-usa/tx/edinburg between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
A strong inverse relationship is found between scanpath length and you may LSAS get, r (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever disregarding county anxiety, and you can remained when state stress try managed to possess r (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step 3).
A strong bad relationships are discovered anywhere between overall saccade matter and LSAS get, r (29) = -.511, p = .005 when disregarding state anxiety, and therefore stayed tall a when county stress are regulated having r (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero dating try discovered between mean saccade amplitude and you may LSAS score although not, roentgen (29) = -.176, p = .362 even if county anxiety is managed to own roentgen (26) = -.160, p = .417